Don’t Confuse Growth Capital Investment and PIPE Financing

Last month’s Growth Capital Investor webinar on negotiating with hedge funds for financing included a discussion by the program’s panelists, Joe Smith of Ellenoff Grossman and Schole, and Adam Epstein of Third Creek Advisors, over the differences between most hedge fund-originated investments in emerging growth companies and those made by other types of investors such as private equity, venture and mutual funds. The primary difference being that most hedge fund investments should not be considered investments at all. As Smith noted, hedge funds using PIPE structures to invest in small cap companies are better characterized as financiers rather than investors – a critical distinction that company management and boards too frequently fail to grasp, or choose to disregard. Epstein makes the same point in his recent book on small cap corporate governance, “The Perfect Corporate Board”:

“Even seasoned directors and investors sometimes fail to appreciate that in the small-cap ecosystem there are investors and there are financiers….The routine failure of small-cap companies to make that distinction is significant because officers and directors wrongfully assume that any party that invests capital directly into the company is a “partner.” Financiers, though, are not in the partnering business….”

Hedge funds exist in a place in the financial markets which allows them to raise ungodly sums of capital from other investors so long as they deliver to them on two primary objectives: uncorrelated risk-adjusted returns; and near-complete liquidity. These mandates engineer hedge funds to go where the profits come hot and fast.

RINO Cooked Books, SEC Says

RINO International Corp. (RINO) executives David Zou and Amy Qiu agreed to pay back $3.5 million after regulators charged them with keeping two highly divergent series of accounts and diverting funds for personal use. RINO, which provides services to China's steel industry, formed through a reverse merger with shell Innomind and Jade Mountain Corp. in 2007. The reverse merger was funded by two dozen investors who put $24.5 million into the company, according to the SEC.

ZST Technologies

Chinese Reverse Merger Investor Succeeds in Asset Hunt

A single high net worth investor is taking on a U.S. exchange traded China-based company, ZST Digital (ZSTN), whose stock went into a free-fall when the company stopped filing SEC financials in late 2011. The investor, Peter Deutsch, and his long time lawyer, David Graff, were able to get a New York federal judge to issue ex-parte orders which enabled them to raid the Brooklyn, N.Y. home of ZST's former CFO, Henry Ngan, and the offices of the U.S.-based investor relations firm Taylor Rafferty. Ngan's cell phone was seized in the raids and is in possession of a court appointed receiver. Growth Capital Investor has learned that the phone has messages on it showing in late 2011 ZST was communicating with several U.S.-based institutional firms about depressing the company’s stock price in order to make it easier for ZST’s CEO to buy it back and take the company private again. The scheme – to raise money from U.S. investors, then depress the stock by going dark on financial reporting, in order to buy it back cheap and go private – was only a theory Deutsch used in his initial motion filed in Delaware. That motion asked the Chancery Court to see the company’s books and records after CFO Ngan denied him access.

GelTech Sues Knight Capital, FINRA over Suspicious Trades

After its stock suffered in unusual trading activity in February and March, GelTech Solutions (GLTC) is suing FINRA and clearing agent Knight Capital Group (KCG) in an effort to determine the identity of parties who allegedly manipulated prices of GelTech Stock. GelTech filed the action on May 7 in the New York State Supreme Court. Juniper, Fla.-based GelTech sells fire suppression products and IceWear clothing that holds down body temperatures. The company says its FireGel product is an environmentally harmless means of fighting fire efficiently while using less water than traditional methods. Issuers with stock manipulation claims tend to face problems obtaining trading information in lawsuits even when they know the identity of the alleged culprit.