Markets
Thinly Traded BioMed Issuers See Favorable Terms
|
Conventional wisdom in the private placement market has long held that an issuer’s size and liquidity largely dictate a deal’s structure. The most onerous discounts and warrant coverage are reserved for the smallest and most thinly traded companies, the thinking goes, while the terms improve as an issuer’s size and liquidity grows.
But a review of unregistered common stock PIPEs and growth equity private placements (GEPPs) over the past year reveals that the rule of thumb has hardly applied to biotech and pharmaceutical issuers. Traditionally companies in these industries have been the most active pursuers of private financings, and findings indicate that some funds are willing to take high risks for high rewards. Using Sagient Research’s growth equity market monitor PlacementTracker, Growth Capital Investor analyzed private financings over 12 months ended Jan. 31.
